this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
72 points (69.8% liked)

Solarpunk

5513 readers
123 users here now

The space to discuss Solarpunk itself and Solarpunk related stuff that doesn't fit elsewhere.

What is Solarpunk?

Join our chat: Movim or XMPP client.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ex_06@slrpnk.net
poVoq@slrpnk.net
SteveKLord@slrpnk.net
72
Yes, Actually, Individual Responsibility Is Essential to Solving the Climate Crisis (www.sierraclub.org)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to c/solarpunk@slrpnk.net
96 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A fixation on system change alone opens the door to a kind of cynical self-absolution that divorces personal commitment from political belief. This is its own kind of false consciousness, one that threatens to create a cheapened climate politics incommensurate with this urgent moment.

[...]

Because here’s the thing: When you choose to eat less meat or take the bus instead of driving or have fewer children, you are making a statement that your actions matter, that it’s not too late to avert climate catastrophe, that you have power. To take a measure of personal responsibility for climate change doesn’t have to distract from your political activism—if anything, it amplifies it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"We” as in consumers don’t use enough to hurt companies by divesting.

I think you're confused by what divesting is. That's us as business owners, not as customers (obviously we as customers can hit them simultaneously from the other side too).

Yes, individually it doesn't hurt them much, but it becomes the death of a thousand cuts.

If you can put pressure on your pension provider, local government, church, favourite charity or any other organisation you care about to drop funds with them in entirely then all the better.

By all means do anything you can to reduce your individual carbon footprint

Divesting is not to do with that, it's about hitting these companies right in the share price.

[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Here is the definition of divesting.

You seem to be confused about what individual carbon footprint is because you’re talking about business choices as if they are an individuals choices.

Business owners divesting has nothing to do with an individuals carbon footprint.

If you can put pressure on your pension provider, local government, church, favourite charity or any other organisation you care about to drop funds with them in entirely then all the better.

This is accomplished by group action and legal/political pressure which is the opposite of reducing your individual carbon footprint. That is the systemic change I am saying we need.

Not telling people they need to walk to work so they don’t burn fuel. Or get solar panels to stop funding coal, when they live in an apartment.