this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
134 points (90.4% liked)

World News

38979 readers
3188 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xhrit@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Maybe. Maybe not. The Un appoints people to Committee from nations that commit abuses the Committee is studying, in the hopes they will be inspired to stop committing those abuses.

You know, like how Iran was appointed to chair the the human rights Committee despite routine violations of human rights.

The fact is the Un's only goal is appeasing dictators to keep peace. It is the geopolitical equivalent of giving car keys to a toddler to play with to make them stop throwing a temper tantrum.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Arguably those countries are the ones most in need of sitting down and working out how to meet the goals set.

The alternative is a circle jerk of nations who have already achieved it or higher standards congratulating themselves.

I know which one is more likely to bring about the needed change.

[–] xhrit@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

those are who should be working out how to meet the goals set. not the ones setting the goals.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 1 month ago

Why? They’re the ones who can set realistic goals for them.

Nor does the existence of these goals prevent nations from going above and beyond, it’s about bringing the baseline up.