this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
263 points (83.6% liked)

Technology

59207 readers
2934 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Why did UI's turn from practical to form over function?

E.g. Office 2003 vs Microsoft 365

Office 2003

It's easy to remember where everything is with a toolbar and menu bar, which allows access to any option in one click and hold move.

Microsoft 365

Seriously? Big ribbon and massive padding wasting space, as well as the ribbon being clunky to use.

Why did this happen?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Drusenija@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I assume the extra padding was a function of touch screens becoming more prevalent since trying to hit the 2003 style buttons with a finger was not that easy, although I don't remember offhand when touch first started becoming a thing in Windows so it might have happened the other way around. But either way it's likely still a factor in why the ribbon with its extra padding has stuck around.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
  • Larger click targets for touch screen users

  • Larger screens with higher resolutions, meaning less need for cramped UIs

  • Larger click targets for trackpad users, as the PC market moved from desktops with relatively precise mouse inputs to small, imprecise trackpads that laptops had

  • Usability studies showing people generally like padding and spacing in their UX (despite Reddit and Lemmy insisting it's evil and everybody hates it)

[–] mint_tamas@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I think it’s a function of greater screen resolutions being available.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Tablet and phone touch devices also don’t have keyboard hotkeys like desktops do. In a desktop computer you can afford for the icon bar to be a tiny cramped piece of shit because it’s really more of an early crutch until you learn the hotkeys you need. That mechanic doesn’t exist on a phone or pad. You need the menus and buttons to actually be usable permanently.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's very funny, of course. But if adaptive design and all that crap are so hot today, could they please limit that to touchscreen-first devices? No sane person would actually write a work document or code on a touchscreen if there's a keyboard.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There's nothing about word processors that make them difficult to use with a keyboard and mouse.

New UX has improved that usecase as well.