164

Horizon Zero Dawn Remastered confirmed by ESRB rating (www.videogamer.com)

submitted 2 days ago by simple@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We have reached new levels of "remaster of game that already looks great and runs well"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I'll be honest, I played through HZD and liked it a lot, but I came away with a list of minor improvements that could have made the game better.

If anything, Forbidden West had all of those same problems and more, and it had a less interesting story. Just to talk about the quests, for instance, I found myself running in boring laps trying to get a particular resource to upgrade a particular weapon, repeating the same battle so many times that it became truly tiresome.

Then I finally upgraded the weapon... and found that by the end of the story I had a bunch of incompletely-upgraded weapons and armor that nevertheless left me so overpowered that the final boss fight was hilariously trivial. If I'd invested the enormous amount of grind to actually max out all the top-tier equipment, then the fight would have been even easier than that.

The franchise has a lot going for it, but they need to figure out their pacing.

Edit: Also, I definitely don't need a pointless little board game. "Hey, you want to play Strike?" "Fuck no! I'm out here trying to save the fucking world! Fuck off with your minis!"

[-] GriffinClaw@lemm.ee 2 points 10 hours ago

Hard agree on the weqpon upgrades. Getting the perfect one, upgrading it to the nines and FEEL like it was worth it was one of the fun parts in HZD. Not so much here (Wildmaws shudders)

Regarding Strike, if they had slowed down the pace of the game, like death of the world in a few years instead of months (with hard timeskips you could gree to), and set the Strike tables in out-of-the-way corners you never have to go to without good reason, I MIGHT have felt like playing it. Deff interesting, just not part of the overall tone of the game.

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

With as much as they talked about the irrevocable destruction of the global ecosystem coming up in a matter of months, and then the constantly rotating day-night cycle, I imagine it would be possible to find out if your in-game time played actually was more or less than that deadline. It would be hilarious if the world was going to end in six months but then the math showed that you actually spent more than a year running around shooting the fins off of robo-pterodactyls.