this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
714 points (99.3% liked)

Facepalm

2626 readers
197 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I have been working from home for years and my employer is not watching our screen. However about a decade ago we received a company wide email from an admin reminding everyone that they can see DNS requests when we're connected to the VPN.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thats why i have a laptop for work, solely for work, nothing but work right next to my big rig

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wait they didn't give you a laptop? If they want you to work remotely they really should be giving you a device.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nah, i actually wanted to use my own equipment (tax purposes). All the shit is web based anyway

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They have to in this country. As we deal with not-secret-but-private stuff at my job, they had to supply us some gear to lock down and we DMZed it.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sounds like he's remoting into the computer in the office from another computer at home (pretty common in IT since you probably have admin tools perfectly configured on that computer and specifically configured for its network config) but with Windows Remote Access it lets the person physically at the computer see everything by default. But i would really hope that someone in IT would be painfully aware of why you shouldn't do sensitive personal browsing on a work computer or a work network

[–] lud@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don't RDP that often to physical devices, but I'm pretty damn sure the default settings for RDP forcefully logs/locks out your user on the physical device and only your lock screen is visible. I have never tried it but I'm also pretty sure it's possible to have two logged in users at once, one using RDP and one using the physical device.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I was blanking pretty hard when I wrote that and meant to write RDP while thinking of TeamViewer. Need to post stuff less late at night

[–] DokPsy@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago

Remote access with continuum/connectwise, TeamViewer, etc gains access to the screen including for control but doesn't normally black out anything locally.

If its in a common area with speakers, anyone can both see and hear anything done on the machine.

[–] mark@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago

For desktop windows this is not true. A remote sign in will sign out the local user and vice versa

[–] fatalicus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

pretty common in IT

I've never heard of anyone in IT regularly remoting to their work computer.

If we remote anywhere it is to a jump host, and those are terminal servers, so no monitor connected.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah this is a pretty weird setup they've got going on.

Like you say they're going to be remoting onto their work computer and then having their remote connection remote onto another remote terminal server.

It's a holographic holodeck all over again.

[–] MagicPterodactyl@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I think it's kind of an old school way of doing things. My old sys admin boss did that every day up until her retired.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

That means they're monitoring them ... Gotta exploit that, see what happens.