this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
754 points (98.8% liked)

linuxmemes

21225 readers
55 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    754
    As it should be (sh.itjust.works)
    submitted 1 month ago by 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    77 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] doctortran@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Shit like this is why I can't abide GrapheneOS or their cheerleaders.

    It's legitimately the same attitude as Google itself. This parental, condescending tone, acting as if wanting freedom to control their own devices is somehow irrational. Continuing to push this toxic idea that handcuffs are the only way to protect users. Like a sysadmin at a workplace, but without the justifiable reasons.

    [–] MTK@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

    Dude, not having root is objectively safer, and grapheneOS is security first.

    If you want a rom that gives you absolute freedom, there are those as well, but it's not as secure.

    P.S you can root grapheneOS, it's just not recommended or catered to and while I don't agree with their tone and the obfuscation of it, I don't think it matters as it just completely goes against security.

    [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    For the vast majority of users it's the best configuration. Google doesn't cater to small user populations.

    [–] Darorad@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

    Yeah, but people installing GrapheneOS probably aren't in the vast majority of users