178
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ok, but giving consumers control of THEIR data shouldn't be optional. Same way car manufacturers shouldn't get to decide who gets know about what happens inside YOUR car no matter how proprietary and unrepairable their internal systems get.

I'm a lot less happy about "both 'options' existing" when one is literally pushing for practices that should not be. Period.

I don't care whether you personally care about your game saves. The fact remains that you, or any given person, might, and that those cases shouldn't be an avenue to extort.

The main reason Nintendo gets away with it is that since you don't care, and since they are only mistreating a minority of their users, there is no big backlash.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

I don’t care whether you personally care about your game saves

Exactly, nor should you. I'm just stating that I personally don't care, so I'm not going to boycott Nintendo or something over it.

That said, I very much do believe individuals should actually own the hardware they buy, and I'm fully supportive of efforts to root their devices. I believe strongly in Right to Repair, and I believe customers should, at minimum, get documentation about how to repair their devices (i.e. board level schematics, part lists, etc), as well as no blocks from the vendor for manufacturers to sell parts. There's a good chance that this type of information could help people root their devices, but as long as the vendor is commercially supporting their platform, I don't think they should be obligated to provide source-level details (I'm buying the hardware here, not the software). But once they stop supporting it, they should be obligated to provide information about how to load alternative software onto the device so customers can continue supporting their own hardware.

Nintendo gets away with it because the laws protect them, and even obligate them to aggressively protect their brand. Those laws should certainly change. However, as long as they provide a product that provides value to me, I'll get it. I'll do what I can to mitigate issues though (e.g. I'm shopping for a new car, and I intend to remove/disable the chip that communicates w/ the manufacturer).

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
178 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16406 readers
1533 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS