Programming

17509 readers

478 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

parquet vs csv (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 months ago by GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml to c/programming@programming.dev

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What's your take on parquet?

I'm still reading into it. Why is it closely related to apache? Does inly apache push it? Meaning, if apache drops it, there'd be no interest from others to push it further?

It's published under apache hadoop license. It is a permissive license. Is there a drawback to the license?

Do you use it? When?

I assume for sharing small data, csv is sufficient. Also, I assume csv is more accessible than parquet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah depends on what you're using it for. CSV is terrible in many many ways but it is widely supported and much less complex.

I would guess if you're considering Parquet then your use case is probably one where you should use it.

JSON is another option, but I would only use it if you can guarantee that you'll never have more than like 100MB of data. Large JSON files are extremely painful.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

since the data is tabular, JSONL works better than JSON for large files