this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
616 points (96.4% liked)

Memes

45608 readers
1154 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
616
You thought you were, didn't you? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by MMNT@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, but what if the science is full of propaganda?

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For science journalism sure? Maybe some shit with pharma. But in general not really unless you mean like education which may or may not be counted depending on definition.

What I can say is that Bill Nye and Kent Hovind are entirely different forms if they are both propaganda. Also one of them is infinitely more harmful than the other and it ain't the man with the catchy theme song.

[–] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not anti science but you have to follow the money. Who are paying for the studies no matter where they're done? I believe in science as a process of learning and science is telling me there are a lot of mistakes and bias in science. Of course not all of them, but enough to take it all with a grain of salt.