this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
159 points (98.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5212 readers
566 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
159
These school buses no longer belch pollution. They also give the grid a break. (www.motherjones.com)
submitted 2 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When you have the buses as batteries, they can not be used as buses. Most places use buses as a general public transport network and not just for school children. Hence they run through the entire day and need to be recharged over night. Students then just use the general public transport to go to school.

This is not a genius idea, but a waste of resources.

[–] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's never really occurred to me that the US is quite unusual in having fleets of buses dedicated to getting kids to and from school. I wonder why that is?

Because yeah, here in the UK kids either go under their own steam, are dropped off by their parents, or take regular public transport (or a regular bus that's chartered for the school run twice a day).

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because us doesn't have public transit, and is pretty spread out, so walking isn't always feasible. A lot of people do drop kids off though, but it leads to huge traffic jams.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why can they not just use the school buses to create a simple very basic bus based public transit system?

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Probably liability? And maybe they only pay the drivers part time? Plus, the school buses are absolutely the cheapest money can buy. The seats are too close together for adults to use, and they still might not have seatbelts?

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago

Likely has to do with population density.