I think the whole point is that the option should be available to people and not bankrupt them in the process. If you break your foot and don't want an ambulance great but if some other dude does and wants the ambulance he should be able to take the option and not pay 4500 dollars for the ride.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I totally agree, I object to the idea that people will just needlessly waste ambulance resources.

[–] Amanduh@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure someone can come up with a plan to deal with frivolous calls while still not bankrupting people in need right?

[–] hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

Yep, it’s a felony to even call the emergency number frivolously.

[–] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 months ago

Here in the UK you can be prosecuted for calling an ambulance unnecessarily. As a result, not many people do it. If we're calling for one, chances are it's because we need one.

Broken foot and we're not alone on a mountain somewhere? We'll make our own way to A&E, thanks. Having a heart attack? You gotta know we're hitting 999 and demanding an ambulance.

And yeah, of course there are people who try it on because they think their special, or they're having a real bad mental health time, but we have pretty highly trained operators who know how to sift through the calls and triage them appropriately. It's not often that one of our ambulances gets to a frivolous call.