97
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 month ago

In most fields, even private companies understand the need for industry standards.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Yeah, like how Apple works with other phone and tablet manufacturers to use a unified charging and data port.

[-] astrsk@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

I can’t tell if this is sarcastic because Apple contributed over 20% of the engineers credited with developing USB-C.

All told, Apple contributed 18 of 79 named engineers listed on the connector certification project or under 23%. 9to5

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's sarcasm, because it took EU legislation to force them to actually fucking use it in their phones a decade later.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They don't contribute engineers out of the kindness of their hearts. They do it for entirely selfish reasons — to have a large influence in industry standards, and the competitive advantages that enables.

Do you also believe Google created Chrome for "freedom", instead of to gain a competitive advantage in web and ad tech standards?

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

Do you believe any for-profit entity give two shits about anything except for profit? Oh, that's right, the one you like/work for is different.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

In what universe was my comment promoting any for-profit? Are you mentally deficient?

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world -1 points 4 weeks ago

Why do you think any "privatized" entity does anything? Altruism? Charity?

[-] astrsk@fedia.io 10 points 1 month ago

And in new fields of privatization, someone has to win out on the standard. It should have been NASA demanding an interoperable spec but someone will win out here eventually and it will be standard in the future.

[-] robolemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

When you make a new standard to consolidate related-but-drifting standards, all you’ve done is make n+1 standards.

XLCD

Ah yes, XLCD, created by Rbndall Mvnroe.

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Only when it's their standard most of the time, which is the reason why we have so many standards for so many things that do basically the same thing

[-] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

And that's why we have the EU telling apple and their fanboys to eat shit and use USB-C :) without these legislators we get the chaos you mention

For consumer products I don't agree with enforcing it through the beginning though as it might hinder innovation. But once you have a few working cases you enforce the better one

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
97 points (99.0% liked)

Space

8341 readers
280 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS