this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
45 points (80.8% liked)

Open Source

31717 readers
124 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Cloak@lemmy.ml
kevincox@lemmy.ml
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml
45
Why is GrapheneOS against GNU? (grapheneos.social)
submitted 4 months ago by lunar_dust_222@sh.itjust.works to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

They say that GNU is spreading misinformation and "stop getting info from charlatans"?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] exu@feditown.com 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, the FSF stance on firmware is really weird.

Basically, if the firmware is not intended to be updated it's fine. But distributing updates, like security fixes, for firmware as blobs is somehow bad.

However, there is one exception for secondary embedded processors. The exception applies to software delivered inside auxiliary and low-level processors and FPGAs, within which software installation is not intended after the user obtains the product. This can include, for instance, microcode inside a processor, firmware built into an I/O device, or the gate pattern of an FPGA. The software in such secondary processors does not count as product software.

https://ryf.fsf.org/about/criteria

Here's an article from the previous time (?) this topic came up.

https://ariadne.space/2022/01/22/the-fsfs-relationship-with-firmware-is-harmful-to-free-software-users/

[โ€“] dragnucs@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Not really weired. For example, a keyboard has a firmware. 99% of keyboards have no way of it being updated or changed. It is part of its electronics. So not a big deal. But, if a keyboard has a way to update the firmware or install another one, then it should be FOSS.