this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
73 points (94.0% liked)

World News

32509 readers
677 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bobr@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org 31 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. Lukashenko knows the war is really unpopular with his people and that supporting Russia with troops would be a death sentence for him.

That Lukashenko didn't even condem the Ukrainian counterinvasion shows how much of a minefield this war is for him.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why would Belarusians side with Russia... it aint like Russians were "nicer" to them than ukrainains, georgians, moldovans, kazakhs, balts, chenchens, jfc i am getting tired listing them. you get the vibe...

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Because Russian troops are stationed within a day’s travel of Minsk and the country depends on Russia for ocean access?

Same reason Kazakhs have traditionally supported Russia, until they got that new shipping route built that bypasses Russia entirely.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Moreso, Russia has actively supported the current Belarusian government including helping to put down protests in Belarus.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Hey, please cite a reputable source for this or remove it.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Neither is credible: they also claim that the weapons were made in Russia, not that they were given by Russia. Remember the whole "soviet union" thing, where a lot of Eastern European countries still have leftover arms and ammunition from?