465
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by mozz@mbin.grits.dev to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rarWars@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 month ago

The percentages for 2016 only add up to 97, and the 40% bar is longer than the 41% of 2012.

[-] Klaymore@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Maybe 3% voted for a third party, and because they aren't shown the other bars were expanded to fill the entire space

[-] rarWars@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago

They could've done a little green sliver like they did for 1980.

[-] Mojave@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Looks like '95 has 5% third party votes. The lower bound for visually representing votes here may be somewhere between 5% and 3% for the purposes of this graphic

[-] FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Just like the sub on reddit, the data in DataIsBeautiful apparently doesn't actually have to be beautiful.

[-] flora_explora@beehaw.org 0 points 1 month ago

Also, sometimes it say "won" or lost" behind the candidates, sometimes there is an asterisk, but for many entries, there is no information who won and who lost?

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 3 points 1 month ago

The asterisk is explained up top, and they only indicate who won when it is backwards from the popular vote total.

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
465 points (95.9% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

0 readers
1 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS