this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
320 points (87.7% liked)

linuxmemes

21225 readers
111 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    320
    I don't think I'll continue using Arch, btw (lemmy.ohaa.xyz)
    submitted 3 months ago by FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    114 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    "Arch is stable"

    [–] KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 3 months ago

    It is! My Desktop hardly ever topples over!

    [–] ikidd@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    So I'm trying to understand if you think that shutting down an update during regenerating the initramfs indicates that Arch isn't stable? Because that's a FAFO move and would crater any non-atomic update distro.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    It doesn't ruin Debian or Fedora as they do the bootloader last

    If it is interrupted it just boots the old kernel

    [–] dan@upvote.au 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    When talking about Linux, "stable" usually means "doesn't have major changes often", or in other words, "doesn't have lots of updates that break stuff". That's why "Debian stable" is called that. Arch is not that.

    [–] sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago

    Stable does not mean it's for everybody. My installation runs since now 10 years.

    (The only other distribution this failsafe I know of is Debian)