this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
244 points (98.8% liked)

Games

32513 readers
1497 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 79 points 3 months ago (3 children)

one of the few publications that seemed to do actual work. what a shame.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Indeed. Its sad to see a reputable name go before something far less reputable, like Kotaku for example.

I guess it must be true, hate clicks and outrage do generate more revenue than real, genuine gaming articles written with pretty good journalistic integrity.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

eh, kotaku has some solid articles and reporting as well. gaming journalism in general is incestuous shit but most of the anti-kotaku sentiment comes from goonergate shit

[–] Ashtear@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The hilarious thing about you getting downvotes immediately is Kotaku led the reporting on this news this morning. Link is in the posted article, y'all.

[–] Maven@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nah, Kotaku had a shit reputation for years before gamergate got shat into existence. Their reporting was sloppy and often wrong, most of them sucked at the games they were reviewing, they spammed out vapid clickbait articles about nothing to farm ad rev. The only reason people respect them now is because they were positioned opposite gamergate, as if two things can't both suck.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

no. literally no one gave a shit about kotaku before goonergate.

[–] Maven@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 months ago

You're joking, right? Pre-2012, it was one of the most visited sites on the internet and in the top 20 gaming sites. They weren't some no-name blog. Then after they hired Totilo, their shitty pop-tabloid reporting became so infamous even Forbes had articles about it, well before gamergate was ever a thing. This all used to be sourced info on the wiki page.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

a reputable name

?

they were wholly owned by gamestop. their magazine was a lever to drive gamestop subscriptions and upsells. y'all worried about kotaku crack me up, if there were real ethics in game journalism a supposedly independent publication reviewing the products wouldn't be owned by the largest vendor of the products.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is it actual work to just say what the publishers tell you to say and give everything a 7?

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you actually read their interviews and reviews you will see that it is way more in-depth than any YouTube essays or twitch streams. It sucks that those things attract more people because I get way more informed at an objective level with GI articles and similar podcasts.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm gonna guess they got better in the 15 years since I was subscribed.

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

I wouldn’t say better, if you didn’t like them in their earlier days then I doubt you would like them now. To me, they just provided more thorough insights into the games than random YouTuber or Reddit comment section.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Eh.... they were beholden to the games industry as much as any publication, and perhaps more due to their ownership.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

yeah i meant work as in interesting content rather than journalism. never referred to GI for reviews but they had fun content.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

that's fair. I suspect their relationship with gamestop, which had it's own mini-e3 for a while, led to a ton of great content discovery that many journalists didn't get access to back in the day.