this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
698 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59572 readers
3443 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
698
YouTube tests server-side ads to make your coveted blocker obsolete (www.yahoo.com)
submitted 4 months ago by downpunxx@fedia.io to c/technology@lemmy.world
382 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

YouTube has been spotted testing server-side ads, which could pose a problem to ad blockers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 36 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Honestly... How much has Google spent trying to counter people skipping ads?

Is it less than the amount of potential profit if everyone was forced to watch ads?

This seems like that situation recently where NYC paid a million dollars to enforce people to pay for train tickets, which was less than twenty thousand a year in lost revenue.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The amount of people who:

  1. currently use an ad blocker to watch YouTube, and
  2. would be willing to watch the ads or pay for premium if their ad blocker stopped working

Are not statistically significant to YouTube's viewership or income.

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 3 points 3 months ago

I figured that. If I was to guess, I would say ~90% use the native app on their phones or TV to watch YouTube.

In total, I have to assume ad blocking viewers make up a single percent or less.

I don't see how this could make financial sense.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I think it's mostly about saving face for advertisers. Which is funny because Google never does anything for saving face for their users as they shut down services that literally cost a rounding error for them to run.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I think it probably breaks even and fits with their strategy to abuse everyone until they pay for premium