this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
698 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59572 readers
3443 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube has been spotted testing server-side ads, which could pose a problem to ad blockers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I mean, if you're not paying for it, and they can't advertise to you, what do they need you for?

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 52 points 4 months ago

To keep claiming they have x billion accounts...

There's a big reason why these companies don't remove the bots and willingly allow them to do whatever. It boosts their numbers to inflate their actual worth.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

at least on my part, what they get from channel memberships (a whopping 30%) I'm sure exceeds the amount in ad revenue they lose from me

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Does YouTube have competition? Your line of inquiry doesn't mean much if the content is only on YouTube.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what point you think you're making.

YouTube doesn't want you visiting if they can't either put ads in front of you or get you to subscribe to premium. I appreciate wanting to access YouTube without ads, but from where they're sitting, if they scare you off with server side ads all the better.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Simply put: why care about their point of view? Google does not have your best interests in mind, often the opposite. There's no where else to get almost all of the content, why do without or waste time with ads in this short life.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

YouTube could fall off the face of the earth and I would probably see my quality of life improve slightly.

I don't give a shit about Google. Perspective here is important when you threaten to leave the platform all together, as if they would care. If you're one of the users they gain no ad revenue or subscription revenue from, they're probably happy to see you go.

Could they be doing more to try to turn Adblock users in to paid subscribers? Sure. I'm not here to defend their methods. I'm just saying that if you're not paying, and you can't be served ads, they really don't care if you continue to use the service or not.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I did pay for it but they massively increased the price while the recommendation algorithm was deliberately made worse and they wouldn’t stop pushing short format videos.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Youtube is google No 1 source of machine learning content. Fuckloads of video, audio and subtitle data they can use to feed and train their systems. Youtube itself doesnt need to make profit, thats just a bonus for them.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

YouTube advertising is more than 10% of Google services total profits.

That's not a bonus, that's a dependant revenue stream.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah no, that is revenue. Youtube is 10% of total Google/Alphabet revenue. That doesnt necessarily equate to 10% of profits.