this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
385 points (98.7% liked)

Open Source

31737 readers
141 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Back in the day the best way to find cool sites when you were on a cool site was to click next in the webring. In this age of ailing search engines and confidently incorrect AI, it is time for the webring to make a comeback.

This person has given his the code to get started: Webring

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So would people having webpages instead of social media accounts

And there's your problem... (in the voice of Jamie Hyneman, Mythbusters). To see a real return of webrings, people would need to have (make) their own pages and curate some links.

Thinking about it, with the rise of selfhosted, it's actually really viable, cobble together a docker stack with a WYSIWYG HTML editor somewhat oriented to the task (pretty sure something out there can be repurposed), a web server, proxy, and that's about it (probably missing a fair bit, not my bailiwick, still, once the stack is made and solid, I'm guessing many would host, I would). Set a threshold of how many people you're willing to host, say 50 or whatever so you're able to check for CSAM or other legal minefields, and Bob's your uncle, stir in some solid security to keep it isolated if you're using it at home (or VPS) and it's golden.

OK, more complicated than I initially thought, and it's way less friction to use something like faceplant, which is entirely their point. Still, I think, if given the opportunity, and functional tools, and low enough friction, many would prefer to have a hand curated presence on the web above a facebook page.

I'll stop, but thanks for the interesting thought seed.

[–] chip@feddit.rocks 10 points 5 months ago (3 children)

There has to be a cultural shift as well. It's not the early 2000s anymore where a substantial portion of internet users could tinker around their desktop computers. I recently got fiber at home and we're locked behind CGNAT. I could look for a solution for myself since I grew up opening ports on my router, but imagine someone who grew up with bubble-wrapped smartphones trying to navigate their way through that bs.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 7 points 5 months ago

Website hosting is still a thing. Not everything needs to be self hosted.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You're not wrong, but here we are, talking open source and GPL licences. If you can make a game portal work, or the web in general, it's viable, your ISP is a choke point though, agreed. Was more talking about an easy stack like the 'arrs, but for webrings, just an idea...

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

At least now we have options like Pikapods where you can just throw a containerized server up cheap. Even people who might be overwhelmed by a VM can do that.

[–] marx2k@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I also just got fiber from AT&T. I'm pretty grateful that their gateway/router can just offload all traffic to my own router and a t as just a dumb gateway. Right now I use duckdns to just public host a subsonic server for when I'm in the car or out and about but it's been very pain free.

I read up a little on cgnat but can you tell me what issues you face? I'm curious.

Never mind.. read up on it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier-grade_NAT

I guess the alternative would be routing everything through a static ip providing vpn