Technology

59539 readers

3332 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

731

Valve runs its massive PC gaming ecosystem with only about 350 employees (arstechnica.com)

submitted 4 months ago by Beaver@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

265 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

No harm meant. I do think Steam is the golden example of a big business done right. All I'm saying is that there's room for improvement.

However do we know their full PNL/balance sheet?

We can make an educated guess. Amazon's S3 charges roughly $0.025 per GB, so an 100GB game would cost $2.50 for Steam to upload to a user. For a $30 game, that's around ~8.5% or just over 3 downloads before it's unprofitable.

Obviously Valve isn't paying consumer level S3 prices, and obviously users can download multiple times. But I would be extremely surprised if they didn't make a rather large margin on each sale

[–] Corigan@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Total fair always room for improvement, no ones perfect.

Appreciate the good discussion!

[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Assuming there will never be any updates, 3 downloads is what regular gamer can do. First computer, second(friend's) computer and reinstallation on first computer.

[–] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

$0.025 per GB is the most expensive option on S3 I could find rounded up. It would be absolutely insane if Steam were paying those prices when they have their own servers. I also used 100GB game size as a large number, and $30 as a small price tag (for an 100GB game).

I was trying to be charitable with the numbers and it still came out pretty positive

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

$0.025 per GB is the most expensive option on S3 I could find rounded up.

What is cheapest and at what speed?

I also used 100GB game size as a large number, and $30 as a small price tag (for an 100GB game).

I get it, but then there are all those heavy f2p games like War Thunder, from which Steam doesn't get anything.

[–] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You can look it up yourself, I was just giving a worst case scenario

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

aws.amazon.com doesn't seen to work in Russia

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Amazon's S3 charges roughly $0.025 per GB

For storage or for download?

[–] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Download. It's also rounded up. Storage is negligible compared to bandwidth, especially considering Steam's business model

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

And their cost is going down over time while their revenues are increasing since they take a % off every sales and sales are increasing and so is the average price of games.