this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
420 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59314 readers
4719 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0x0@programming.dev 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What makes you think this'll deter international spying?

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Trying to set barriers seems logical when it comes to outsiders. But, spying by its nature is constant attempts to sneak past barriers, so attempts aren't going to stop. It'd just be called collaboration instead of spying if information was shared freely and spying would be unnecessary.

Maybe we have a different definition of deter. I don't see it as stop, but trying to make it less easier. Why would spies stop trying to spy? I don't expect that number to change. If it did that would be some pitiful spies.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’d just be called collaboration instead of spying

Happens all the time, the NSA can't spy on US citizens to it asks GCHQ to do it for them, and vice-versa.

Kaspersky's software had been known for flagging US 3-letter-agencies' malware, so there's that...

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's with trusted parties where that type of collaboration is less likely to happen between parties that are hostile to each other. I would not expect blank country to trust any blank adversary countries software and instead be wary of their motives and back doors, and they would be smart not to with both sides seeking each other harm.

I don't think you understand that I am viewing this from how sides that see each other as potential threats view and treat each other. Not talking about countries that are already collaborating as if they were allies.

In case you don't understand. I am not claiming that countries do not spy on their own citizens and seek methods to spy even more on them. I'm talking about how countries can react to countries they label as adversaries.