this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
67 points (97.2% liked)

Privacy

31946 readers
636 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Even though i have Proton VPN blocking trackers and use firefox with arkenfox EFF always says my browser has a unique fingerprint. Same with Mullvad browser and Tor. When I switched Tor to "Safer" it said near unique fingerprint, and only when i switched it to safest did it say i am protected from fingerprinting

from my results id guess that it has no fingerprit thanks to no javascript, but 90% of websites are useless without js

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] refalo@programming.dev 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

possible

In practice? No not really.

JShelter is the only thing I have seen that stops creepjs from working at all. But that doesn't mean you can't be fingerprinted. Not to mention Crimeflare has been very successful with their TLS fingerprinting methods (among other things), which doesn't even require working JavaScript.

And compared to creepjs, EFF's tool is a joke and works quite differently, and not in a good way.

[โ€“] notanaltaccount@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Are websites often implementing all creepsjs tequniques? It seems like if standard identifiers were enough they wouldn't add in more just because minimal benefit relative to extra effort.

Does TLS fingerprinting do more than fingerprint browser type?