science

14722 readers

945 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

233

submitted 4 months ago by ooli@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dyathinkhesaurus@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (16 children)

Extrovert. Not extravert. Source: am introvert.

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 60 points 4 months ago (9 children)

Tldr A British English, O American English

[–] Audalin@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is not to say that Jung wasn't a genius. Jung was THE BOMB DIGGIDITY (which, by the way, I wish was an official term in the Oxford dictionary).

If they love Jung so much (which I agree they should because Jung was amaaaaazing), why don't they honor him by using the spelling he actually used?

Love etymological articles with unreliable narrators.

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

Unreliable narrators keep us all in check, they make us question what we believe or know to be true.

load more comments (7 replies)

load more comments (13 replies)