science

14722 readers

945 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

233

submitted 4 months ago by ooli@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Audalin@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is not to say that Jung wasn't a genius. Jung was THE BOMB DIGGIDITY (which, by the way, I wish was an official term in the Oxford dictionary).

If they love Jung so much (which I agree they should because Jung was amaaaaazing), why don't they honor him by using the spelling he actually used?

Love etymological articles with unreliable narrators.

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

Unreliable narrators keep us all in check, they make us question what we believe or know to be true.