this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
20 points (70.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

29665 readers
1339 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics (NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out)
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
vatlark@lemmy.world
forkball@lemmy.world
quinten@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
20
Given that we vote for entire comments, we don't expect people to split their comment into many sub-comments. (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by snek_boi@lemmy.ml to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A different thing are conversation back and forths: each comment is in a new branch of the comment tree.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snek_boi@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My post tried to convey that most people do this:

[Original post by OP about COVID-19] Comments:

  • User A: "COVID-19's symptoms can vary from person to person, and the vast majority of people do not present life-threatening symptoms. This can make it easy to conclude that COVID-19 cannot possibly kill someone [edit: here's a source that shows that many people actually believe COVID-19 cannot possibly kill someone: statistics.net]. This is an unfortunate situation, because trusting the science can lead people to use appropriate masks and reduce its spread. [edit: added the word "appropriate" thanks to User C]
    • User B: "Really? I don't know anyone who believes COVID-19 cannot possibly kill someone"
      • User A: "I responded to you by adding a source to my original comment through an edit"
    • User C: "My niece used a cloth mask in the Prague metro and still got COVID-19. I suppose the type of mask matters."
      • "You're right! I'll edit my original comment to reflect that."
    • User D: "I'm sure you won't reply to this comment if I say that I don't accept science."

and they don't generally do this:

[Original post by OP about COVID-19] Comments:

  • User A: "COVID-19's symptoms can vary from person to person."
  • User A: "Many people think COVID-19 cannot possibly kill someone."
    • User A: "My source for this is statistics.net"
    • User B: "Really? I don't know anyone who believes COVID-19 cannot possibly kill someone"
      • User A: "I responded to you by adding a source to my original comment through another comment"
  • User A: "Mask usage helps reduce the spread of COVID-19."
    • User C: "My niece used a cloth mask in the Prague metro and still got COVID-19. I suppose the type of mask matters."

The point is that we usually don't split our points into many comments of the same level. Levels here refer to this:

  • Level 1 of a comment tree
    • Level 2 of a comment tree
    • Level 2 of a comment tree
      • Level 3 of a comment tree
  • Level 1 of a comment tree

When I say that we take that for granted, I mean that I don't see people splitting up their comments in the same level. Neither do I see people talking about splitting up their comments. In other words, neither in practice nor in discourse do people split up their comments.

Edit: Rewrite for clarity

[–] jesterraiin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You may be an exception, posting each part of what you wish to say in a different comment.

I'm not and I have no idea what you're talking about, since you edited the thread and I have no recollection of what it stated originally.

[–] snek_boi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah. Sorry for the lack of clarity. I edited the comment. I hope it makes sense now