this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
176 points (99.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55099 readers
244 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you do interesting stuff, use a good VPN. But those will also have to either delete their logs (Wireguard is actually worse here) or be brave.

Or Tor...

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Am I missing something with Wireguard? Isn't it just a open source VPN software?

What's wrong with it?

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wireguard has performance improvements at the cost of NEEDING to store client data longer.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago

Update: yes this is still true. MullvadVPN and ProtonVPN (which I dont recommend) both patch wireguard to work with less logs.

Officially, Wireguard cannot be no-log