this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
441 points (98.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44151 readers
1120 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That is true for outsourcing companies, but not true for product companies usually.

[โ€“] treadful@lemmy.zip 28 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I think it's equally true for product companies. Do you know how hard it is to get a company to prioritize bug fixing over feature work? Shy of a user revolt, or a friend of the CEO reporting an issue, bugs are almost always second priority or lower.

[โ€“] hightrix@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Iโ€™d say this strongly depends on the industry.

In an entertainment or ad sales product, Iโ€™d completely agree with you.

In a medical or financial product, the bug will take precedence.

Medical? Your funny. Healthcare software is the worst. There is a reason the stuff that matters is decades old. Cause the new stuff rarely works. And the rest... tell me again why I have to fill out the same forms year after year, and they never populate with my previous answers? Or why I have to tell them my 2 year old son isn't menstruating or hasn't stolen a car yet (on the same form no less). The software is so hard to use the providers have given up.

[โ€“] excel@lemmy.megumin.org 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You wish it was like that in the medical industry, but it absolutely is not

[โ€“] hightrix@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I work in the medical industry. Any software that controls any device or reports any data used in the OR is absolutely treated this way.

[โ€“] treadful@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Not in my experience. Unless maybe if it causes loss of funds or other security issues, which usually get a fair response.

[โ€“] sudo42@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

But not at the software companies that require monthly subscriptions, right? They get money every month, so they have lots of incentive to fix all the bugs. Right? ... Right? /s

depends on how bad and widespread the bug is. Also if there are just to many they will do a bug squashing program increment. at least places I have worked have.

No idea what you are talking about. Product companies are exactly what I am referring to. Some director signs off on the purchase, probably has never even seen the software. But he has seen the sales pitch. That is what the C suite of small companies are for, mingling with the decision makers.