this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
471 points (88.3% liked)

linuxmemes

21448 readers
859 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
    •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    471
    Debian used to be so good. What happened!? (lemmy.world)
    submitted 5 months ago by renzev@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    93 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     

    Firefox on Debian stable is so old that websites yell at you to upgrade to a newer browser. And last time I tried installing Debian testing (or was it debian unstable?), the installer shat itself trying to make the bootloader. After I got it to boot, apt refused to work because of a missing symlink to busybox. Why on earth do they even need busybox if the base install already comes with full gnu coreutils? I remember Debian as the distro that Just Wroks(TM), when did it all go so wrong? Is anyone else here having similar issues, or am I doing something wrong?

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] lemmy_nightmare@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    When I see a Fedora user, I see a future Arch user btw

    [–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    This is funny because on a laptop I had I did this exact same progression - I started on Debian, but it didn’t have the right kernel version for my audio drivers, so I switched to Fedora, but it was running slowly (probably because of gnome, it lets you choose so this was my fault) so I moved to arch (with xfce) because it has a reputation for being relatively lightweight. It worked better, but it took longer to get working with the unusual chromebook hardware.

    [–] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Man a laptop new enough to require a newer kernel but slow enough for gnome to be slow. That's an annoying spot to be man.

    [–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    It wasn’t that new (2017), it just had weird hardware which iirc only recently got supported without proprietary drivers by the new audio system.

    [–] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

    That makes a lot more sense. I remember living with $200 laptops for a while and that's kinda what I was thinking initially.

    [–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

    When I see an Arch user, I see a future NixOS user FWIW

    [–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

    idk i can do everything that arch can do, with distrobox and having a immutable distro on top