this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
547 points (97.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9626 readers
733 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Fun fact: many cities had issues with female fruiting trees because their fruits would rot on the ground, causing bad smells and rodents. So they replaced them with male trees.

Unfortunately for allergy sufferers, this increased pollen counts exponentially. But that's not all. Because these trees can "sense" that they are competing with other male trees, they produce even more pollen than they normally would.

Edit: My information is outdated! It was based on an article that I read back in the early 2000s and it looks like it's been debunked.

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is only partially true. Not all trees, and not even most trees, have exclusively one gender. There's not that much scientific evidence supporting your claim of a conscious effort to plant certain gendered trees resulting in exponentially higher levels of pollen

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So I had to look this up.

My information was based on an article that I read back in the early 2000s and it looks like it's been debunked.

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Thanks for checking it and the update, that's cool of you

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Would it have been possible to pay a crew to clean up the fruits?

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 months ago

In an age where cities are getting less and less tax revenue, replanting new trees that don't fruit is often more cost effective in the long run.

And even if you did hire a crew, they aren't going to get every piece of rotted fruit. Animals, being what they are, will bury or hide them.