this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
165 points (91.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35729 readers
1403 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am not targeting any group, race or religion or whatever, just an observation why does it seem that freedom of speech appears to invoke an image of a defence to be an asshole?

I get it, free to speak your mind and all and sometimes hard truths need to be said that but is the concept so out of whack that people have less empathy for others that they don't agree with that they antagonise another to the point of disrespecting the right to dignity?

It seems like humanity is hard wired for conflict and if it isn't actively trying to kill itself it seems to find an outlet for violence some way somehow. Maybe it is social conditioning or just some primal urge that makes humans human.

I don't even know where else I could ask it, and it seems kind of stupid to think about so... have at thee

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you’re trying to be neutral or just don’t much care for some particular political issue

There is no such thing, if you're "neutral" you're merely defending the status quo. The right defends the status quo, the left opposes it.

Read this quote by one of the greatest heroes of the world, Martin Luther King:

I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to 'order' than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice [...]

[–] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess that's not wrong, but I can passionately care about some other matter where the status quo is borked, and I can choose to fight that, and not some other random thing you care about. That doesn't make me an ass or something other.

It's a really interesting thing how the so-called "left" and "right" have chosen to fight over a handful of random things, and just as randomly chose to support one or the other side of the argument.

Almost as if, I dunno, these things weren't even all that divisive in the first place, but it just might be in someone's interest for people to fight over and not notice potentially worse things that are going on.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and just as randomly chose to support one or the other side of the argument.

Randomly? This has never happened even once in the entire history of the human race.

But I see it where you're coming from, neoliberal propaganda convinces its viewers that politics is something out of touch for the masses, it's their way of taking your out of the fight because you educate yourself, you'd become their enemy.

[–] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sometimes it does feel pretty random to be honest. There are lots of cases where a political issue has become reversed as to which side is supposed to support it (support for unions in the US, as an example that comes to mind).

It's also way too often the case that one side starts support for some issue, and the other side begins to vehemently oppose it, frankly for no good reason than just because they can't be seen agreeing in public. This is really the main reason why I stopped giving a fuck about politics, as it's really almost all about just who's a top dog and not much else.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Without public support there can't be any big changes, you're the reason why the conservatives stays in power. You're a conservative by proxy.

[–] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, I wasn't aware there's a conservative party in our parliament, much less in power. My bad I guess? Or are you just proving my point about accusing someone of something random without knowing anything?

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There either is or someone else did your job for you. Thank them!

The good part about democracy is that not everybody is clueless like you.

[–] JayEchoRay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Bleh, it seems ideology is unavoidable😂, seems that can be applied to the world over actually if it examined where countries try not to rock the boat too much to ensure their best interests are not disrupted too much