73
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Wanderer@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Instead of training locals they hire foreigners. Instead of raising wages due to market forces they hire foreigners. Instead of letting house prices go down they get foreigners.

All the things that the average working class person cares about. Cheap housing, jobs, job training. Is pushed further and further away from them and instead what benefits the landowners and business owners is given to them.

The best bit is the left who used to push for work for locals has been taken on the ride and basically say if anyone is against immigration in anyway is racist and will not discuss it under any circumstance. The only people that listen to the working class is the far right. It's literally the only answer that's why people are going to them.

On top of that most people are not against immigration as such. No one minds people who have values of the country, who are educated and hard working.

But what do the stats say, literal government stats, that the people that come in are less educated than the locals, they take more from the country and they commit more crime. At least some of them, or from some countries. These are the people that the locals want to stop. But the left says its racist to even talk about this and will do nothing about it, for the right they benefit due to being land or business owners. So who is remaining? The far right.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

they take more from the country and they commit more crime.

Source? My understanding is that immigrants commit less crime per capita because they don't want the law enforcement exposure that could result in deportation.

https://www.npr.org/2024/03/08/1237103158/immigrants-are-less-likely-to-commit-crimes-than-us-born-americans-studies-find

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Do you really think wages would go up if foreign workers weren't hired? Why would they? What reason would companies have? If everyone pays shit, employees don't really have the choice of finding a better job regardless of who is being hired.

It seems to me that if you're worried about people not getting paid enough, then you should be fighting for higher wages, not less immigration.

But immigrants sure are a convenient scapegoat for those corporations, aren't they?

[-] nevemsenki@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Supply and demand.

If there's less supply of workforce, workers are in a better position to demand better conditions or wages. Oversupply of workforce gives employers more power in turn.

More immigrants - or anything that balloons the workforce - helps the side of employers, even without considering the fact that most immigrants are satisfied with worse conditions and/or lower pay than western workers.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Like I said- convenient scapegoat you're making of immigrants on behalf of those corporations.

[-] nevemsenki@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Not really, it's something I've lived through already before.

When the USSR collapsed, most of our industry imploded virtually overnight. Demand for work disappeared, and so did wages and worker rights; you are in no position to bargain when there's a line of people to replace anyone at the drop of a hat.

Then we joined the EU and the problem slowly fixed itself by... emigration! A LOT of people left to work in Germany and the UK, making the workforce scarce (=reducing supply). And let me tell you, it's a lot easier to negotiate with employers when people are hard to replace.

But go on, explain to me how bringing in a cheap workforce will improve the locals bargaining position on the job market.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago

The USSR? Where there weren't private corporations? How does that at all apply in a capitalist system?

And what I am explaining to you is that you are blaming immigrants when you should be blaming greedy corporations. You seem to think they will have your back if the borders are closed. They won't. That's not how capitalism works.

[-] nevemsenki@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

They weren't private but the management wasn't aby less shitty. And the moment the old system collapsed they turned even worse.

Also not sure how you came to the conclusion I think corporations would 'have my back'. I literally explained they'll only negotiate with workers as long as workers are not too expendable. It doesn't matter what makes workers expendable - societal changes, AI, immigration - the workers positon will worsen and corps will push against their rights.

Why do you think our govt is importing hundreds of thousands of workers from Asia? To push the wages down and be able to loosen worker rights. Because as long as the worker is replaceable - oversupply, if you will - they aren't in much position to push any demands.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Yes, you think they'll negotiate with you.

They won't.

They don't care about you, they care about making money. If they pay you more, they make less money.

You think they'll pay you more if there are no immigrants. They have no reason to. They don't like you more than they like foreigners.

[-] nevemsenki@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

As long as there isn't enough people waiting on jobs to easy replace someone, there is room for negation because if the guy packs up, the work won't be done and no money is made.

Sure, the company can pack up shop and relocate to a different country, but that also has a bunch of costs in itself. It may be more profitable to pay people slightly more - again, negotiation. But again, that is only possible if it isn't easier to just quickly hire someone else.

You don't need to believe me, just check how the average hungarian wage increased in the last 20 years. That's the effect when there aren't enough surplus workers, so employed people can't be easily replaced.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

So your country has such a tiny population as so few people unemployed that if they banned all immigrants, corporations would not have enough employees to make profits and wouldn't finds some place to be more profitable if that's the case?

Because you're right, I don't believe you. Since that is not how anything works.

[-] nevemsenki@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

It's literally how it worked. You can check the statistics.

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
73 points (95.1% liked)

World News

38563 readers
3153 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS