316
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

Today in our newest take on "older technology is better": why NAT rules!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Doesn’t that mean private non-routable subnets like 10.x or 192.x have always been a hack?

[-] dan@upvote.au 1 points 3 months ago

No, because there's use cases for systems that aren't connected to the internet. Also, public IPs can be dynamic, so you might not want to rely on them internally.

[-] orangeboats@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Private addresses don't necessitate NAT. IPv6 also allows private addresses in the form of fd00::/8, like fd00:face:b00b:1::1.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
316 points (85.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

19208 readers
1033 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS