Technology

59207 readers

3134 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

758

Top EU Court Says There’s No Right To Online Anonymity, Because Copyright Is More Important (www.techdirt.com)

submitted 4 months ago by General_Effort@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

122 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The key problem is that copyright infringement by a private individual is regarded by the court as something so serious that it negates the right to privacy. It’s a sign of the twisted values that copyright has succeeded on imposing on many legal systems. It equates the mere copying of a digital file with serious crimes that merit a prison sentence, an evident absurdity.

This is a good example of how copyright’s continuing obsession with ownership and control of digital material is warping the entire legal system in the EU. What was supposed to be simply a fair way of rewarding creators has resulted in a monstrous system of routine government surveillance carried out on hundreds of millions of innocent people just in case they copy a digital file.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Every single person in the EU needs to sue on these grounds.

Also fuck this corporatist statist bullshit. Why the fuck do people keep voting in authoritarians?

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

Cause for making an authoritarian change it's sufficient to vote once, to revert it is voting in the situation created by it. It's a logical OR in their favor.

And it makes perfect sense that a big centralized state and putting rule of law above pride cause this.

It's like the "computer that you can't throw out of the window" quote. A government you can't change via riots is a bad government. A republic is about rule of people, not of stamped toiled paper with rules on it. The good French rioting tradition is also from this.

Rule of law should never be put above common sense and pride.

In a couple of decades the 2A crowd in the USA will become better understood by Americans and Europeans, I think.