this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
30 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22056 readers
43 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rosemary Penwarden, 64, who sent the letter to an oil company’s delegates argued it was a form of “satirical protest”, said she was astonished by the outcome.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bermuda@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Crown prosecutor Richard Smith told jurors the trial wasn’t about debating climate change or Penwarden’s character, but the use of a falsified document. “It was just to cause disruption to the conference with a thinly veiled defence of satire woven into it,” Smith said.

I mean, makes sense. But considering her attempts to cancel the meeting didn't even work, I'd be surprised if she gets the 10 year sentence for this.

[–] PeaPanties@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She worked against oil company and private greed. Totally justifies the crime.

If only she was sensible enough to commit crimes against humanity, she should have been given only slap on thw wrist.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

Nah, she should have created a corporation that did the crime. Worst case it that they get acquired after years of litigation with her profiting off the fame and jumping out with a golden parachute.

[–] 0x815@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hope she won't get a sentence, but I am not a lawyer for expressing an informed legal opinion. The point I make is that we know in the meantime that the oil industry has been downplaying climate change and its related health issues for decades, although they new about it from their own research in the 1980s already. And no one faces any consequences. As a legal layman I can't say whether that's legal, but I don't feel it's right.

[–] P1r4nha@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

Victimless crime