this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
50 points (89.1% liked)

Selfhosted

40113 readers
820 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
50
Alternatives to CloudFlare? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 5 months ago by foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hey is there any alternatives to CloudFlare reverse proxies? I want to hide my server IP but not share everything with CF...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Do you something like a vps would be more secure? Paying some dollars a month

[–] Toes@ani.social 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I like that idea.

I'd suggest OVH or Digital Ocean.

If you think a DDoS attack is possible I'd suggest azure for that.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I'd probably use a VPS myself.

I seem to recall db0 saying that lemmy.dbzer0.com is behind some sort of reverse proxy. I assume that they're in the same boat as OP.

looks

$ host -t a lemmy.dbzer0.com
lemmy.dbzer0.com has address 51.77.203.116
$ whois 51.77.203.116
[snip]
role:           OVH Technical Contact
address:        OVH SAS
address:        2 rue Kellermann
address:        59100 Roubaix
address:        France
admin-c:        OK217-RIPE
tech-c:         GM84-RIPE
tech-c:         SL10162-RIPE
nic-hdl:        OTC2-RIPE
abuse-mailbox:  abuse@ovh.net
mnt-by:         OVH-MNT
created:        2004-01-28T17:42:29Z
last-modified:  2014-09-05T10:47:15Z
source:         RIPE # Filtered

% Information related to '51.77.0.0/16AS16276'

route:          51.77.0.0/16
origin:         AS16276
mnt-by:         OVH-MNT
created:        2018-03-07T09:24:45Z
last-modified:  2018-03-07T09:24:45Z
source:         RIPE
$

I don't know if that's a VPS, but looks like they're using OVH.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

a reverse proxy these days is pretty much just a requirement of any dynamic service. they often run on the same host as the software

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Aight, but db0 had something about it obscuring the server location, IIRC.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago

it’s possible, but that would seem… odd… for such a large and tech-savvy instance. there’s a lot of reasons why this isn’t a good idea, and very few technical reasons why it is

my guess is that it’s less about obscuring server location for privacy reasons as is the implications in this thread, and more about handling changes cleanly or something like that - in which case, sure it obscures the server location but more that it makes the server “location” (or hardware, etc) irrelevant and fungible