78
Version 256 of systemd boasts '42% less Unix philosophy'
(www.theregister.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
78 points (93.3% liked)
Linux
7806 readers
99 users here now
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
My ideal Linux system would consist of only the kernel, systemd, an immutable root file system, and flatpaks.
Fuck the Unix philosophy, this isn't the 90's anymore.
So Fedora atomic?
There's like a dozen variants as well to suit any specialty application
That's what I currently run. But it still has a lot of stuff installed as rpm.
I'm curious what Ubuntu's snap-only system is going to be like. AFAIK they push snaps over flatpaks because flatpaks aren't suited to using them for the base system utilities while snaps are.
As someone involved heavily in OS security after Y2K, I can only say, "FAFO". This is gonna be good.