Technology

59314 readers

4948 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

635

TV producers wanted AI rights of extras forever, says union (www.theregister.com)

submitted 1 year ago by wrath0110@midwest.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

92 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There’s a difference between “no AI allowed” (not what the unions are calling for) and “contracts need stipulations about AI usage” (reasonable).

If you are not familiar with what is actually being negotiated over, then please don’t weigh in. WGA/SAG-AFTRA are not calling for an AI ban. Every time these debates come up armchair AI “advocates” swarm like cryptobros to call everyone backwards/ignorant/resistant to change regardless of the context.

[–] bioemerl@kbin.social -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s a difference between “no AI allowed” (not what the unions are calling for) and “contracts need stipulations about AI usage”

If those contacts include paying actors as much as they would have needed to act and restricting it's usage when writing scripts the difference is moot. If your erase all benefit to using AI it becomes worthless.

[+] hoodatninja@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] bioemerl@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They 100 percent want to reduce AI usage so that writers can't be automated away.

Mr. August, a screenwriter for movies like “Charlie’s Angels” and “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory,” said that while artificial intelligence had taken a back seat to compensation in the Writers Guild negotiation, the union was making two key demands on the subject of automation.

It wants to ensure that no literary material — scripts, treatments, outlines or even discrete scenes — can be written or rewritten by chatbots. “A terrible case of like, ‘Oh, I read through your scripts, I didn’t like the scene, so I had ChatGPT rewrite the scene’ — that’s the nightmare scenario,” Mr. August said.

The guild also wants to ensure that studios can’t use chatbots to generate source material that is adapted to the screen by humans, the way they might adapt a novel or a magazine story.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/29/business/media/writers-guild-hollywood-ai-chatgpt.html

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They 100 percent want to reduce AI usage

Yes I agree. That is what I’ve been saying this entire time.

I don’t see the problem. Want to use AI to fart out cheap written content or highjack someone’s script? Don’t use the studio system. It’s never been easier to shoot and distribute without Hollywood/unions.

Either way, AI isn’t banned from Hollywood. They are calling for regulation on specific use cases involving union writers.

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Reduce =/= ban