this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
159 points (88.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43966 readers
1500 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not saying the worst, otherwise I would need to include the star wars sequels or transformers movies... Just some really dumb movie that somehow got praised.

For me has to be Ready Player One. That movie message is so "uhuh" obvious that is stupid, the whole nerd that saves the world in a thing that otherwise would be useless to know in real life... The so over the top evil gaming corporation. The whole 80s and 90s movies and games references get old after half an hour... And it's so pandering towards the geeks and nerds, they really want the viewer feeling really cool for knowing that is the Shining hallway, or that is a Monty python reference... Or look a GUNDAM! YOU'RE SO COOL FOR COLLECTING THOSE GUN PLA! Look we have also overwatch and halo in the background! You're so cool modern gamer!

Also the obviously attractive "nerd" hacker girl that thinks she's ugly and deformed for having a small hard to see red tint in one side of her pretty face... Cmon man. In no universe anyone would think that actress is ugly.

And the message at the end is so hilarious: Look man, you're cool for getting these references and being a real gamer is cool, but go outside more!

Is like the creators have no self awareness.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] mukt@lemmy.ml 36 points 5 months ago (3 children)

It is too early to say Oppenheimer?

[โ€“] bunkyprewster@startrek.website 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Agreed. Bombastic. Felt like it missed the whole point of Oppenheimer's moral dilemma

[โ€“] Omniraptor@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I'm biased but I thought it was pretty clear with portraying Truman as an unambiguously bad guy and Oppenheimer as decent but failing at a critical moment and then regretting it later

I've always imagined his moral dilemma was knowing that (after the Nazis were defeated) going ahead with the bomb was wrong, but wanting to do it anyway - because they had become so invested in the idea, and wanted to see if they could.

[โ€“] Toribor@corndog.social 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'd been pretty eager to see it. Everyone told me how intense it was, I actually put it off for a little while because I wasn't sure I was in the mood for something really bleak and existential.

Watching it I was like oh okay this is a movie. Not bad but I wouldn't call it an intense experience.

Haven't been able to finish it, losing my attention on it. Want to join the hype but... ๐Ÿคท

[โ€“] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

Meh. If you like a political bio pic it's probably very interesting but it didnt grip me as tight.

[โ€“] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago

I think it was just too long, maybe at half of the length they might have thought more about what belongs in there