this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
77 points (88.1% liked)
Aneurysm Posting
1862 readers
65 users here now
For shitposting by people who can smell burnt toast.
Instance Rules:
- Nothing promoting crypto, blockchain or NFTs.
- Nothing right wing.
- Nothing anti science.
- No tankie support.
- No TERFS.
- No porn.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Just in case anyone actually wants to know: fire is not plasma, which is ionised (electrons not bound to the nucleus) matter, but simply smoke particles hot enough to glow.
Fire is much more complex than that. Fires appearance comes from:
Fire is an active chemical reaction. It's a transition between often solid or liquid, sometimes gaseous, fuels, into gaseous products, all while undergoing a chemical reaction. It's not a state of matter, states of matter concern the phase of equilibrium conditions, and fire is decidedly not in equilibrium.
Thanks for the correction! My first part was still right though - fire is not plasma.
This needs an ELI5 version...
Hot things glow, some chemical reactions glow, fire does both, mostly the latter especially for cooler fires.
"With this in mind, it should be clear that a candle flame gives off light even though it is not a plasma. In contrast to candle flames, certain burning mixtures of acetylene can reach 3,100 degrees Celsius, with an associated Debye length of 0.01 millimeters, according to the Coalition for Plasma Science. Such flames are therefore plasmas (as long as the flame is much larger than 0.01 millimeters, which is usually the case). Other flames, including flames from campfires, propane stoves, and cigarette lighters, have temperatures that lie somewhere between these two extremes, and therefore may or may not be plasma."
https://www.wtamu.edu/~cbaird/sq/mobile/2014/05/28/do-flames-contain-plasma/
I somehow never knew what "fire" was until reading this comment. Huh.