this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
393 points (100.0% liked)

196

16555 readers
1804 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Mmm. So I agree with your initial assessment, but the later rationale not so much

Disinformation is the tool used by war today. Russia is doing A LOT of it as of late coming up on this election cycle and could easily push propaganda and fake news via channels like this.

Similarly, and on the other side of this coin, the US could also do this to push propaganda. You cannot trust things for face value on the internet.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Again, if it was propoganda I think it would be more incendiary. You're free to go through the information if you wish, and there probably are some juicy secrets somewhere in the mess of files, but my spotcheck made me yawn. If you don't want to live in a world with no truth, you have to start thinking about the intent of the author. If the intent of the author here was to plant misinformation, or to sow division, then they did a terrible job at it. What little I read gave me no interest in reading more.

[–] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 2 points 5 months ago

We’re on the same page here, I think it’s pretty likely that a lot of this stuff isn’t actually dangerous. Snowden leaks point out massive constructs to automatically read in info and essentially create a DB of intel

And that was years ago. I find it highly unlikely that anything serious would slip through and go unnoticed on a search engine like google.

Discord tho…