this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
386 points (91.4% liked)

Technology

59314 readers
4603 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

haven’t had the potential to replace every job on earth, that’s the real difference for me.

This really doesn't either tbh. But that's certainly what they're selling.

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How do you know what the limits of this technology is? How do you know that they couldn't be able to reach that point in 5-10-20-50-100-1000 years?

Unless you're thinking of the current iteration of the technology and not its future evolutions.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Its future iterations that are definitely not this?

Sure, I don't know.

I'd wager we'll probably reach climate collapse / political crises that throw us off course before a "Westworld-esque" thing is ever possible.

People don't seem to realize that these tech leaders are all just weaponizing your imagination against you (a.k.a. using a sales technique). GPUs and LLMs aren't skynet no matter how much people want to project that onto them.

Nvidia cares maybe even less about the outcome than I do, they'll sell you all the pickaxe you want to buy in the AI gold rush.