this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
164 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

59287 readers
4407 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
164
You Need to Read the Terms of Service for OpenAI and ChatGPT (youtu.be)
submitted 1 year ago by QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
30 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

For those using ChatGPT, if anything you post is used in a lawsuit against OpenAI, OpenAI can send you the bill for the court case (attorney fees and such) whether OpenAI wins or loses.

Examples:

Attorney talking about their ToS (same link as post link): https://youtu.be/fOTuIhOWFXU?t=268

https://openai.com/policies/terms-of-use 7. Indemnification; Disclaimer of Warranties; Limitations on Liability (a) Indemnity. You will defend, indemnify, and hold harmless us, our affiliates, and our personnel, from and against any claims, losses, and expenses (including attorneys’ fees) arising from or relating to your use of the Services, including your Content, products or services you develop or offer in connection with the Services, and your breach of these Terms or violation of applicable law.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's assume I post a screenshot of a ChatGPT session on social media, and OpenAI sues me for the content.

Don't they have to prove first that it actually is such a screenshot, and not a fake? It's even easier with copied text.

Somehow this rings strangely similar to copyright cases against OpenAI, now with reversed roles. Who owns the authorship, how can we tell?

[–] QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Let’s assume I post a screenshot of a ChatGPT session on social media, and OpenAI sues me for the content.

That hypothetical doesn't have much to do with this indemnification clause. OpenAI wouldn't be the one filing a lawsuit against you. They are the ones being sued by someone else who saw the screenshot you posted.
OpenAI would just send you the bill once the case has been settled (because according to the ToS you agreed to defend them from lawsuits related to your use of ChatGPT).

Don’t they have to prove first that it actually is such a screenshot, and not a fake?

Yes, and during the whole process the prosecutor will force OpenAI to search through their logs/databases and turn over any evidence related to the case. It probably wouldn't take long since the screenshot would probably include the prompt from the User and they would just have to search for that.

Somehow this rings strangely similar to copyright cases against OpenAI, now with reversed roles. Who owns the authorship, how can we tell?

So far the courts have ruled that AI can't claim copyright to anything. The "prompter" could claim the copyright but they would also have to alter the output in some way to make it their own (at least as far as AI art is concerned, I assume it would be similar for copyright on text).