Technology

59243 readers

3280 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1672

Internet Archive is continuing to face DDoS attacks after several days, says “this attack has been sustained, impactful, targeted, adaptive, and importantly, mean” (www.neowin.net)

submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

187 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

That last sentence though...

**"The cyberattacks share the timeline with the legal battle Internet Archive is facing from US book publishers, claiming copyright infringement and seeking combined damages of hundreds of millions of dollars from all libraries." ** *

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

i wonder why print is dead

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How is print books dead ?

https://www.statista.com/chart/24709/e-book-and-printed-book-penetration/

And that's only units, in terms of revenue, ebooks is still pocket change in comparison.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

i wasn't speaking in comparison to ebooks. ebooks suck in every way imaginable.

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What other long-form text format has beaten print books ?

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

why are you coming up with these categories? "print is dead" doesn't mean "because there's print 2.0 now"

—radio is dead
—excuse me, but internet radio is nothing compared to am stations
—yeah, obviously people who don't listen to radio don't want to listen to radio with extra steps
—what other forms of radio has beaten radio?

what are you even

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I am trying to understand what's the argument behind your statement. I mean, there are more books being published than ever and there are more readers than ever. So, I fail to imagine how are books dead. That's why I am asking these questions.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The argument is that no one reads books anymore. Most media consumed today is in modern video and audio formats like YouTube and podcasts. You shouldn't compare paper books to ebooks, you should compare them to views on YouTube.

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

YouTube is video, it replaced TV. Podcasts and music streaming replaced the radio. Why should I compare books to another medium? In fact, back in the TV and radio era, more people consumed thant kimd of media instead of books, and that stays true today, yes. More people watch youtube than read books. I bet more people play games than read a book. But it's comparing different kinds of media. It would be like saying podcasts are dead because more people consume pictures and video on instagram.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

you're wrong. TV replaced the radio, not podcasts. we're not comparing different kinds of media, we're saying new media replaces the old, regardless of form. it's not about numbers; it's about migration. if people moved on from listening to podcasts to consume pictures and video on Instagram, then you could totally say that, but they didn't, so we don't.