this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
1336 points (98.1% liked)

Science Memes

11148 readers
3393 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sal@mander.xyz
fossilesque@mander.xyz
SciBot@mander.xyz
1336
Hero (mander.xyz)
submitted 5 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
202 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nifty@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I would use accepted papers as an example, I find that usually helps

[–] Sixth0795@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thanks but are telling me to build over their work

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Not exactly, you should do what interests you. I meant as in look at accepted papers for tips on organization, flow, how to explain your methodology and present figures etc. Really great research can suffer sometimes if no one can understand your methodology or your motivation for your experiments. But of course besides that it’s helpful if the presented work is meaningful and impactful for your field (your project advisor can help scope this)

[–] Sixth0795@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Thanks man