this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
436 points (84.5% liked)

memes

10280 readers
2544 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
436
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by sag@lemm.ee to c/memes@lemmy.world
 

I am feeling that I posted really something offensive. But I just reposted a meme from Reddit that had 12k upvotes. I know I shouldn’t have done that. I don't know if I break any rules or not. If I really break any rules then Mod remove this post.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Ah, the classic Ultimatum Game. Economists would say that any amount of money should be acceptable for getting punched in the face, because its better than getting decked for nothing. The vast vast majority of people feel cheated if it isn't a 50/50 split. This is what passes for a "paradox" to economists, who could probably all do with being punched in the face more often.

[–] DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

As an economist, I agree.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The problem is that the cost doesn't match the reward. I'd be totally fine with a 90/10 split for just a punch in the face. I'll be over the injury in a week with a lot more than I started with. Raise the cost to losing an arm or leg for a cut, then even 50/50 seems a bit low as the victim's life has changed but the other's hasn't.

I do agree with punching economists in the face more, just in principle.

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

This is why wealth inequality is even more unethical under capitalism than it was under feudalism.