478
submitted 4 months ago by ColdWater@lemmy.ca to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

I'm not sure about specific packages, but in general a packager may not want to increase the upstream version even if they can do it themselves - for example, they may have made some mistake in the packaging process.

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago

Yes, and hence my comment on flatpak which turns out is false (that the upstream developer is usually the distributor/packager too). And the other still applies, distro usually adds a specific tag anyway for their refresh. Like that one time xz on rolling debian was named something x.y.z-really-a.b.c.

I think flatpak packagers should also append the specific tag too if that is the case. Like, x.y.z-flatpak-w where w can be the build release version

this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
478 points (98.8% liked)

linuxmemes

20704 readers
312 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS