this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
780 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

66892 readers
4910 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Repeat after me: This. present. hype. is. not. A.I. By parroting the marketing bullshit, it doesn't become less false. Large Language Models are just glorified pattern matching and everyone who calls them AI is a dumb fuck.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's called AI even if it isn't artificial intelligence, it's unfortunately how language works. Like how literally has been redefined to mean figuratively.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’s called AI even if it isn’t artificial intelligence, it’s unfortunately how language works.

Only for people for whom words don't have meanings. There is nothing "intelligent" about pattern matching. As I said - only dumbfucks call it "A.I." and we shouldn't regurgitate the verbal diarrhea of marketing idiots.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

You can be upset about it, it doesn't change the fact that it IS called AI. Also the meaning of words change constantly.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't make it not a disruptive technology

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

True. But it makes the 30% extra carbon emissions even worse: Ruining our climate for something that isn't even AI. Not that ruining it for anything should be on the table.