this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
140 points (100.0% liked)

Space

8789 readers
37 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Visitor72@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure a contributing factor for this is the high percentage of employees who have 10/10 dream jobs, where they get to fully explore projects that they're truly passionate about. Otherwise, It's probably just as fulfilling and frustrating as working for any other government agency, except for the rocket ships.

Having rocket ships probably boosts morale quite a bit.

[โ€“] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Nasa doesnt do a lot of propulsion stuff anymore to my knowledge. A lot of that has been outsourced to contract companies like SpaceX, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, etc.

They're more in the business of mission operations these days, with some component building in the side. At least as far as my experience has been, that's been the case.