169
submitted 4 months ago by marathon@lemmy.ca to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 24 points 4 months ago

Wasn't twitter really good about banning actual Nazis and not banning journalists until Musk came along? After Musk came, Nazis were unbanned and we saw a huge wave of journalists getting banned.

[-] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 4 months ago

Before Musk, Twitters advertising was driven by engagement, and engagement was driven by encountering things that made you angry. So they were slow to respond to anything but the most egregious cases of hatred and bigotry.

[-] Supermariofan67@programming.dev 16 points 4 months ago

It was always pretty bad, musk just made it worse

[-] Jennykichu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago

No... NO. It was appallingly terrible at banning Nazis, worse than even Reddit in many ways. Twitter banned a tiny, tiny fraction of extremely prominent and openly fascist accounts that had been permitted to operate for years, but they ignored Nazi dogwhistles from large accounts and smaller accounts that didn't gain a following and were used to harass 1-2 people were generally allowed to operate freely.

Remember: they didn't even ban Donald Trump himself until he tried to literally violently overthrow the US government. Twitter pre-Musk was an absolute shit hole, but it was at least headed in a hopeful direction. Musk kept it a shit hole and just changed the direction it was going.

this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
169 points (90.8% liked)

Fediverse

17535 readers
52 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS